First Class Versus Second Class Citizens bearing Arms and The Training Lie People like Hillary Clinton and her rich Hollywood comrades try to deny the right of most of us to keep and bear arms, while they and their loved ones are being protected by guards with guns. This shows how they really feel about whether it’s safer to be armed or unarmed. And it shows whose lives matter to them. In Hillary world, first class citizens are allowed to have armed guards, second class citizens are not. So that raises a question: if the elite are worthy of being protected by armed guards, why are those they look down on as commoners not worthy of armed protection too? One common lie used to justify this double standard is that those who work for government can be trusted and the same applies to the professionals who guard rich people, but second class citizens can not be trusted. This is a lie because American law assumes innocence unless there is probable cause (and ultimately proof) of some k...
Popular posts from this blog
Liberal Violence and Hypocrisy Sixty million times since the passage of Roe v Wade a mother has killed the child she carried. So many mothers betraying their own baby reminds us of the bloody knife liberals hold hidden behind their back. The liberal cult uses the poor and downtrodden now as a weapon of political war and pretends to care about them and want to help them because it would be immoral not to do so, even while claiming that morality must not be the basis of law. But if they ever acquire enough power that they don't need the poor they'll turn on them like a feminist turns on her unborn baby. When the time is right they will take what they can and run, just like Bill Clinton did with the money donated to the people of Haiti. Or take what little is produced and live like kings while those they claim to be champions of live in poverty and in chains, as leaders of communist parties and other dictators have done. This kind of betrayal has taken place in the...
Comments
Post a Comment