Thoughtcrime Laws in Our Future It is established liberal dogma that no right is unlimited. And ultimately that means none is really a right, because those who make law get to decide what a reasonable limit is to the right. Or a judge appointed and approved of by them gets to decide. And neither of them are going to make law and declare the law they made unreasonable, so whatever they decide to do will be defined by them as reasonable, and therefore legal. So there is no real Constitutional barrier even to thoughtcrime laws: Legislative bodies can outlaw thoughtcrime just the same as they outlaw so-called assault weapons, and liberal judges will back them up. All it will take is enough people being talked into supporting thoughtcrime laws, and given what's happening these days I don't think that'll be all that difficult. Imagine the kind of thoughtcrime enforcement imposed on communities like Facebook and in schools by way of PC codes being enforced by real poli...
Popular posts from this blog
Progressivism The liberal cult herds its cattle step by step into the realm of liberal dogma, with each step being a baby step. This moves them progressively further away from those who do not move with the herd, and in time so many small steps add up to huge steps, while those in the herd see very little movement. This is why the divide between liberals and non-liberals has grown so vast, even though the movement has been in small steps.

Comments
Post a Comment